While
the summer can often be a quiet time for the news cycle, it would appear that
Eric Pickles has been trying to break the monotony with a range of tips for
councils
First, he
told us about the support for local high streets, and announced ‘dedicated teams of experts’
to assist local leaders. Now, on that very same day, the CLG Committee took
evidence from Mary Portas, the government-appointed high street renewal guru,
backed with £1.2m for Portas Pilots. Strangely, we learn that, despite her
requests, Ms Portas has never met Mr Pickles and she knew absolutely nothing
about the new training and mentoring proposals. How curious?
Then, he
moved on to parking. Mr Pickles’ has an ambition for ‘shoppers to have a 15
minute grace period to park on double yellow lines without penalty’. The
proposal has been condemned by a wide range of organizations, but this wasn’t
mentioned. He referred rather disparagingly to the income that councils receive
from parking charges and fines. Yet, that same day, the Federation of Small
Businesses published its research on this issue, which confirmed that such
income has actually fallen in real terms over the last 5 years.
As he
directed public anger towards parking policies and traffic wardens, one might
have thought that Mr Pickles would be desperate to draw our attention to the
one council, Aberystwyth, that axed its traffic wardens to save money and to
placate the drivers who railed against them. Of course, within 6 months - after
parking chaos, road rage and fisticuffs, congestion and regular gridlocks –
everyone was demanding their return. Perhaps that explains the silence?
Mr Pickles
then turned his attention to the fire service…. or rather, firefighters’
pensions. Not unimportant, of course. However, there was complete silence about
the scale of the cuts being made in fire service cover throughout the country.
How curious?
Next, Mr
Pickles told us about his planned tax changes for granny annexes. Gosh, it’s
great news, he told us, for all those households – nearly all in the top
council tax bands and containing quite a few mansions – who will receive an
average near £500 cut in council tax. However, he was completely silent about
the higher council tax bills being imposed on millions of the poorest families
by cutting funding for council tax benefit. Why, I wondered?
Then he
turned his attention to those naughty councils that had increased their cash
reserves. Mind you, he didn’t mention that reserves had fallen in a quarter of
councils, nor that the vast majority of the increased total related to already
ear-marked schemes. Never mind, perhaps he missed the comments of CIPFA and
other professional bodies which didn’t share his perspective.
Of course,
his support for coastal towns is welcome; that extra 5% in the £29m fund could
make all the difference. But, for some reason there was no mention of the huge
additional challenges facing many of those coastal towns – especially in Essex
and Kent – which have suddenly found themselves having to cope with an influx
of households being forced out of central London by benefit changes.
Then, why
not raise a glass to celebrate that 100 pubs have been listed as assets of community value?
Let’s just forget that, over the past 2 years, the number of pub closures has
risen from 12 to 18 a week, and more than 200 pubs have been turned into shops.
We should
all welcome the increase in new home starts. But, there’s no reference to his
decision to cut the budget for investment in affordable housing by 60%, nor
that housing completions are at their peacetime lowest level since the 1920s.
More
worryingly, Mr Pickles is lauding the Help to Buy scheme. Why is it that
just about every serious research body, right across the political spectrum, is
unanimous in saying not just that this scheme is wrong, but that it’s
positively dangerous? The very last thing we should be doing is fueling
inflation in a still over-priced market and, thus, actually disabling even more
families from becoming owner-occupiers.
Of course,
I’m pleased that Mr Pickles is helping a few councils with homelessness. But,
why no acknowledgement that homelessness is on an upward trend as a direct
result of the policies he’s implemented?
Unsurprisingly,
last year’s obsession with refuse collection made a re-appearance. But, I
searched in vain for the sentence “I’ve wasted a quarter of a billion pounds
of public money trying to persuade councils to move back to weekly rubbish
collections, but only one did so.”
Who said
the summer can be a dull time for news?